THE BIGGEST DISCOVERY OF ALL "TIMES"
The world of
ufology has been wondering about the reality of UFOs for more than fifty
years. Testimonies are legion but the
explanation is missing. Therefore, the phenomenon is denied. The testimony which follows should reconcile
the logic of scientific fact, which we deny, with these appearances of high
strangeness. The answer proposed here will not fail to challenge many
established certainties. The professor Joseph Allen Hynek, the famous American
ufologist, who was at first very sceptical then wildly in favour of the reality
of UFOs wrote: " when we have the solution of the UFO enigma, I
think that it will be revealed to be not just one step more in the advance of
science, but a powerful and unexpected quantum jump. "
This sentence is known worldwide! There are
dates in History which, I believe should not be missed. This article proposes an unexpected solution.
Even better, a metaphysics! That is to say a physics containing all the
physics: time has three dimensions ! Direction, Density and the Present.
You certainly remember the film 'Matrix' in
which a small group of men and women succeeded in getting out of the illusory
reality of the world. It is exactly what we are going to do, at least by our
thought. We are going to get out of the matrix for a moment, just
the "time" to understand
the universe in which we live, such as I perceived it during a deeply moving,
transcendental personal experience.
One cannot explain UFOs and paranormal
phenomena with our current means of investigation, nor even with the present
interpretation which we have of the universe which surrounds us. I pay tribute
to the scientists of the planet who, every day, experience the anxiety of the subject
to be resolved and who, when they turn around, find nobody to whisper them the
solution. Yet they pursue their research with patience. We are going to
discover together what they call a new paradigm without which it is perhaps
useless to search.
Before leaving our 'world' to grasp the
incredible exploits of UFOs, and the no less disturbing aspects of
parapsychology, I think it would be useful to share with you a series of
surprising sightings. But before, here is a brief presentation of my career.
My main profession has been in aviation, and
I have never been brilliant in scientific studies and have an ordinary
intelligence. After five years in the Air Force as a military air-traffic
controller (tower and radar), I earned my living in the world of specialized
media (economy and stock exchange) to finance studies to become a professional
pilot. As soon as I obtained my license, I went into commercial aviation, at
first on twin-turbo-propellers then on twin-engine jets. With the Gulf war, some
airline companies disappeared, including mine. I then went to university and
obtained a diploma of specialized higher studies in economics (new
technologies). Immediately an airline company hired me as on duty station
manager. Four and a half years and a promotion
later, I was co-opted by the airport in which I worked. After being In charge
of airport resources, in the operations dept, I had a two-year break on the
(French)
My contacts with UFOs were relatively
numerous, either directly or indirectly, but especially in very varied ways.
Here, I shall just make a short list:
-
1977 :
Appearance of an orangey brilliant ball in the sky over Toulon, prodigious
acceleration, an angle of 90° then disappearance (in less than three kilometres
(two miles)
-
1983 :
Appearance of a radar echo flying at 28 000 kph (17500 mph) from east to west,
in the North of Reims, on my panoramic screen (at a distance of about 25
kilometres).
-
1984 :
Appearance of a saucer on the air base of
-
1990 :
Appearance, during a day- dream, of a technical design of an UFO, surrounded by
three non-human creatures (see further on).
-
In December
2001 : appearance of saucer 300 metres away from our holiday resort on the
Isle of Mauritius (reported by my daughter).
-
In February
2002 : appearance of a very fast light (less than 200 metres away) right
above our house on the
-
In March
2002 : a transcendental experience preceded by a loud noise, identical to
one of my wife's UFO sightings. The noise was right above the house. It is the
results of this experience that is reported in this article.
-
In October
2002 : a ballet of lights (between ten and fifteen), between our two
houses, (during a house move), at the west of
The details of these observations and events
have already been reported in other medias or web sites, so it is not necessary
to extend on them here. I suggest we enter the experience, or rather both major
experiences from my point of view.
ACT I: THE CRAFT.
In 1990, during a nap, I found myself
projected into a strange environment where there were three non-human entities,
i.e. not belonging to our race. Although I could not see them, I somehow knew
they were extraterrestrials. This environment consisted of a projection of a
diagram which seemed alive and whose parts were active. There, I saw four parts
of technology:
-
A rotor
turning at a speed close to the speed of light, inside a container.
-
A super-conductive
network which formed a part of the airframe cell, and the internal
connections.
-
A peripheral
torus (ring of circular section) in which
something circulated that was
probably
plasmatic in nature, in a closed loop and at very high speed.
-
A crystal
in the centre which shone powerfully and tuned the frequencies of the device.
Here is the
simplified diagram:
Along with this vision, there was some
strange information:
- Time is intermittent (not linear).
- It is a "sub-state" of matter.
- Vehicles can come from the "FUTURE" as
from the "PAST" .
- They navigate the crystal either "mechanically",
or "psychically" (possible appearance of human interference in
this last case).
The pilot
of the vehicle manipulates two commands :
a. a frequency
(mega-wave of the
b. an
"energy trajectory"
The torus provides the temporal
coherence to the craft. The crystal gives the wave coherence (in the field
produced by the torus and within the physical limits of the airframe unit. The
appearance of the variable force field around the craft locally precedes the
craft (a sort of projection of space-time). The rotating disc is extremely
light. The initial rotation of the disc is supplied by the torus. The disc then
restores its energy to the torus once the threshold of a certain speed is
exceeded. The vacuum is the key in the "mutation" of the state of
matter, and hence its "location".
VERY IMPORTANT: the vibratory level (consciousness) of
the pilot and the occupants is crucial (risk of accidental decorporation –
leaving the body, OBE).
What is important to remember in this
experience, what I qualify as an encounter of the fifth kind, is that communication was made by telepathy. The
information is immediate, powerful and more-than-real. It is not easy to
translate it with simple words as our state of consciousness is so expanded at
those moments.
This close encounter of the fifth kind, or
CE5, provided me with technical information of great importance. It is common
but often badly interpreted by those to whom it happens as is often the case
with extrasensory perceptions.
To these technical aspects,
it is necessary to add this :
- UFOs master the technologies of time and
anti-gravity.
- Those UFOs said to be 'psychic', are of the same nature as the material UFOs
but in a different state.
- The UFO phenomenon is of extraterrestrial origin.
- There are numerous extraterrestrial races.
- Among these races, few have come to visit us.
- Among these, some have a luminous and altruistic
purpose, others do not.
- There will be an extraterrestrial threat when we
have mastered time.
- This threat is related to our belligerent behaviour.
- Fraternity of people should become international.
- This threat will be lessened by collaboration with
the benevolent entities.
ACTE II : 3-D TIME.
A strange phenomenon occurred
on
My wife told me all this the next morning at about
I got up at
New information reached me some
of which is going to drastically change our vision of the world and the
equations of the physicists. It gives a prodigious coherence to all UFO and
paranormal phenomena:
The
unit of time expands or contracts!
Parallel universes are nothing other than a
different flow of time.
In fact, time
possesses three dimensions ! It's not easy to read what follows without a
good dose of concentration because it is a little bit difficult. But if it were
easy to get out of the matrix we would have already learnt how to do it. So
here is the triple nature of time :
THE DIRECTION OF TIME: Dir-Time.
Direction of the flow of time. It is the sequence of time that establishes the
relation between causes and effects. In a trivial way, it is the arrow of time.
It describes
the visible transformation of matter and events. The direction of time is not
linear but intermittent. The direction of time has two directions that can be
represented by a graph axis of a function. The most acceptable is therefore the natural arrow of time going
from past to future. The second direction goes from the future towards the
past. This one is more difficult to interpret because it occurs beyond a definite rate of flow (see the density
below). The keyword of Dir-Time is: transformation. It is therefore the
direction of the variation of the time units during an exchange of information
or a movement.
Unit of time: temporal quantum ( Qt). Notion
introduced in September, 2002.
THE DENSITY OF TIME: D-Time.
Fluidity of the flow of time. It is the relative quantity of time that affects the
behaviour of matter and events. It describes their speed of transformation.
The density
of time is not linear but intermittent, therefore fractal. It implies that
events are more or less numerous in quantities of time that are defined by
convention. In other words, in a density of time D, there are fewer 'bits' of
information than in a density D+1. D-time can be represented by a
graphic axis describing the passage from one density to another. The keyword of
D-Time is: speed (of transformation). It is a quantity of time units
during an exchange of information or a movement. It is also extended as the
possible quantity of information or the quantity of movement per conventional
unit of time (second). The temporal density is the key of the science of
tomorrow.
It is
necessary to understand that in one second, there is a variable quantity of
units of time. The higher the density of time, the higher the number of quantas
of time (we'll come back to this later on). But all the densities of time are
flowing at the same time, including in the past and the future which should not
be confused with the transmitted information. The more temporal density there
is, the farther one goes in the past and future.
THE PRESENT OF TIME: P-Time.
The alignment of the Quantas in the harmonic frequencies. The variation of P-Time affects the cyclic character
of events when they return to their initial point. The Present does not depend
either on the direction or on the Density of time but it is the link between
them. It is a common number of units of time between different time densities
during a transformation in a balanced state. One
passes from one density to another thanks to the present. The keyword here
is : permanence (no
transformation).
The present
such as we usually conceive it does not exist ! It is an illusion and a
convention of language. It will always be only a past or an immediate future up
to the time of Planck (10-43 second) because it is only a problem of
scale. This big truth is to be meditated upon for a long time. For a very long
time.
To summarize,
3-D time is a hologram in which our consciousness evolves by successive jumps
in three simultaneous directions. Far from being unfounded and speculative, 3-D
time is scientifically verifiable. Besides, it is what we do every day thanks
to computer technology ! But in my experience
the intellectual side only came after…
Here are the sketches that I hurriedly drew at 4.30 that morning:
The hourglass suggests perfectly
the density of time. Every graduation represents a temporal density. To
simplify, we could say that a density superior to the conventional
"second" would be a fraction of this second during which as many things (actions) would occur.
Let us remain on the question
of the density of time, the essential key of our fate whether scientific or
spiritual. Moreover, would it not be the ring of their marriage, the Ark of the
Covenant ?
Future fate or destiny
is partially "visible" for those who can experience
precognition. One will retort that it is necessary to wait for the event to
take place to declare that there was premonition. We may note in passing that the only work of scientists is indeed to
describe what is going to take place with the aid of equations ! They can
only be sure when it has effectively taken place but they know beforehand what
will happen, with a small percentage of uncertainty. The same as with
clairvoyants ! It is this "tiny" distance between premonition and
fact that leaves room for the ..quantum ..free will. The difficulty comes from
the fact that this percentage of uncertainty increases AS THE DEGREE OF LIBERTY
of the thing studied.
What decides if it takes place
or not? Freedom ! The higher the degree of freedom a creature has, even more so with
time, the less it is restricted. It is likely that it did not escape you
that the predictability of mineral phenomena was superior to that of plants,
exceeding greatly that of human beings. I'll leave you to meditate on what
follows on from that outburst.
Allow me a convenient
digression here. Scientific method is founded on the reproducibility of a
phenomenon, at first by the experiment, then by the modelling of the causes generated. So equations are born with which we
describe the universe. But always, the experiment precedes the model (except in
pure mathematics). When an equation is officially proposed it has been closely
observed and examined so as not to be contradicted. The equation does not describe reality, it describes what is acceptable.
Einstein followed
But what happens with the
increasing degrees of freedom ? Should we remain with the
"reproducibility" of scientific fact, that principle which issued
from the philosophy of the 'Enlightenment' of the 18th century ? Are not
we in the 21st century? Have we not
understood that increasing degrees of freedom and reproducibility are
incompatible ?
The factor " t " (for time)
is often represented in an orthonormed line by one of the axes of an equation.
The speed, then the acceleration are described with the same unit of time - the second. Now, he who measures decides on the unit
of time because he is the observer. In this way, we vary the distance (and the
speed of transformation of it) and not the time to quantify them. But a new
paradigm has appeared in order to study mechanics and its relativist effects.
To make a quantum jump (without the pun), it is necessary to introduce the
notion of density of time and to
transform this sacred linearity into intermittent values whenever we plunge
into matter to try and understand the nature of it. The results in energy
calculations will be heavily affected.
The corpuscular/wave duality of matter is at the heart of this new paradigm.
When an UFO flies away, it
appears to us as terrific
acceleration. But it is just an appearance! Whatever the physical make-up of
the occupants of these machines, they could not undergo such lightning
acceleration without injury. It is not
therefore "variable spaces" that must be studied, but "variable
time". For example: if the acceleration of an object appears to us to be 100m / s2, (330ft/s2) it is
really, for the occupants, 10m/s2
(33ft/s2) because their seconds change density.
In
other words, the first of their seconds will be the same as ours, then the next
one will dilate to become one of our minutes, and so on, so that in fact, it
accelerates very little. But the illusion which we have is a fantastic acceleration until their disappearance into
another density of time, thus making
them invisible for us AS WE ARE
FOR PLANTS WHEN WE PASS IN FRONT OF THEM WITHOUT STOPPING.
Note : the information according to which energy becomes a vector
in a three-dimensional time comes from
Roland Lehouc, astrophysicist in the astrophysics dept. of the CEA (ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY).
These two curves represent the
absolute and relative expansion of time, in other words the creation and
the creature (who perceives the creation).
The three dimensions of space
(length, height, depth) and the three dimensions of time (direction, density,
present) form the dual perfection of creation. The relation between one
and the other represents evolution. Beings migrate therefore through
space-times in a brilliant genius of fractal geometry.
Nobody will have ignored that the symbol of
the pyramid, common to several distant civilisations of the past, in a
three-dimensional approach, for space as well as time, is a singular
coincidence. Also, would not the two inverted triangles represent a
"powerful" six-sided star hiding perhaps an esoterical meaning
that was understood a long time ago ? Our UFOs don't seem to have appeared just
yesterday, especially if they were around at the origin of these symbols. Is
not the Apocalypse (also) Disclosure?
UFOs pass from one temporal
density to another. One of the fundamental points of the experience was this
vision of the four states of matter which dematerialises as the frequencies increase.
A crystalline sound is emitted to allow the passage towards the invisible
state.
The dynamic behaviour of a UFO
which crosses space-time can go from invisibility to materialisation. But it is
not always the case. Furthermore, our technologies, radar notably, interfere
and sometimes provoke furtive appearances.
Two major reasons would explain the multiplication of UFOs sightings in
the last fifty years.
1) The use of
nuclear weapons - a real temporal seism for other beings, so attracting
them towards us.
2) The use of sophisticated technologies by human beings
that employ emissions of high
frequencies at
high energy. Contrary to all expectations, this contributes to the general rise
of the vibratory frequency of the planet. The real problem is the chaotic
character of these emissions. We are
therefore in a stage of transition.
ACTE III : THE GLOBAL EXPLANATION.
At this stage, I should say
that I am pressing on rather boldly with my reflections. What follows is an
attempt to formalise these concepts. Naturally, whole areas of research are
open to all and open scientific minds will find substance in this new discipline
to interpret into their language : Chronotics. (Term inspired by Thierry Archer).
Time is an enigma! To us it
seems linear. The past precedes the present which precedes the future. How then can people perceive the future?
Is this not a "nasty" problem for science to attempt
to explain this phenomenon ? But it's not examples that are lacking. Really,
every day on Earth, human beings perceive the future in premonitory dreams or
various "flashes". The question is far more complex and eminent than
any regulation of a nuclear power station or genetic manipulation. I repeat the
question to those that might not have heard it : How can the future precede the present?
We all know of Plato's cave*: (*In this legend, people living inside a cave think
that their shadows are real, when in fact they are produced by the light from
the outside of their 'world' coming through a small hole.)
And if time was only the shadow of what it seems to be ?
What is time such as we usually understand
it ?
There are two types of time: measurable time and psychological time.
Measurable time is
objective !
It is a universal agreement! It is an interval between two
"phenomena": before/after. In science, we use the second. It has its
multiples and its subdivisions. This time exists ! It is very useful to
organize lots of things and for equations.
Psychological time is
subjective!
Sometimes, a certain experience will seem to us to have lasted one
minute in certain circumstances, and in others, ten minutes, etc. Now, by
agreement, measured time will determine the average time and will fix in our
consciousness the acceptable proportions. 80 % of our life is calibrated to
psychological time. Curiously, we are capable of waking up at
I would add that certain cycles
and chronobiology are at the
intersection of both times and give substance to what follows.
Here is what Roland Lehouc1] ( Astrophysicist in the dept. of
astrophysics of the CEA (ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY)) says: "We perceive time as one-dimensional, because
our thoughts seem to succeed one after the other in a well defined order. This
argument is subjective. Time could seem one-dimensional without it being so
really, a little as we lose our sight of relief
by closing an eye: we are then surrounded with flat objects and, only
habit enables us to appreciate
distances "
Farther on: "With three
dimensions of time and one dimension of space, only tachyons, particles which
go faster than the light, would exist "
Then: " Numerous aspects of physics would be
rather different with time which is not one-dimensional. For example, energy
would no longer be just a number, but a vector indicating the temporal
direction of movement, in the same way as the amount of movement of a mobile is
a vector indicating in which spatial direction it is moving.
As the amount of movement
is conserved when the mobile is
subjected to no force, the temporal
direction taken would also be a constant of
movement. In other words, if two observers who are moving according to
different temporal directions meet, they will inevitably separate to follow their respective temporal
trajectory, incapable of staying together. From the point of view of an
observer, the other one would appear and then disappear immediately
" (NDA: as UFOs do)
Then again: " Another
important consequence of temporal
multidimensionality: certain particles would no longer be stable. In a world
such as ours, a particle can split only if the sum of the masses at rest (the mass when the particle is immobile) of the particles
produced is lower than the mass at rest of the initial particle. This condition,
which gives stability to the proton and
electron, disappears in a world of more than one temporal dimension. For example, a
proton could disintegrate into a neutron, a positron and a neutrino; an
electron could be transformed into a neutron, an antiproton and a neutrino. The
matter that we know would no longer be stable. "
(Ed.: it is exactly the vision of the states of matter that I had. (see
frame "states of matter")).
Just as there is equivalence
between mass and energy, there is an equivalence between space and time.
It expresses itself in a simple way. The principle of simplicity of Occkam's
razor says that it is the simplest explanation that is best. But when it is a
question of linking the theory of relativity and quantum theory, we see a
mountain of complexity before us. I think, and this is fundamental, that the
more space there is, less there is of time, and inversely, less there is of
space more there is of time. It is precisely the key that elegantly weds the
infinitely big and infinitely small. The difficulty is to understand the nature
of time to be convinced of it.
Jean Heidmann, astrophysicist
at the origin of the SETI project, declared that the Big Bang was not an
explosion of matter but an expansion of space. This difference often cast
confusion in many minds. In the light of 3-D time, and in particular, one of
its dimensions, the density of time, the expansion of the universe is just an
appearance. As a reminder, the expansion of the universe would be due to a
considerable differential between the
thermodynamic forces tending to repel matter and the nuclear forces which, on
the contrary, attract it.
The dilemma comes from the fact that 90 % of the mass of the universe
remains hidden. This observation comes from the difference calculated between
the thermodynamic forces and the forces of atomic cohesion. So the entropic
movement would be just an illusion. Yet another. In fact, there is no choice but to admit that all
space-times coexist. The Big Bang is a dogma in the sense that it is perfectly
arbitrary to think that the original soup accumulated into huge masses, and
galaxies, stars and into planets. If, as is it suggested in this case, matter
would be on the surface of the membrane of a cosmic balloon why would it not be
evenly spread out? We are told that gravity is the reason! Now, we do not know
the real nature of gravity except that
it is a curvature of space-time. Hence,
the idea that gravity is related to the density of time and in no way explains
the formation of celestial bodies. The further we look into space ( weaker time
density) the more we see the outer layers of the universe. But also the further
we look, the further we see into the past (going back in the direction of
time). And in this case we see the internal layers of the universe. Therefore,
the combination between external layers and internal layers reveals entropy to
be an illusion.
When we look at a star (because of its
matter), we perceive an "internal" layer of the universe which is
translated by a curvature of space-time, or in other words, according to my
vision, a "superior" (higher) space-time compared to the space-time
which surrounds it. In this way, the star is not in the same position as its
spatial environment. Black holes are in a much higher density of time and it is
impossible for us to see them in our space-time since we guess them by
calculations.
If it is relatively easy to conceive, at an
astronomical scale, that by contraction of space-time we have a difference of
position between a star and its environment, it is less obvious that it's the
same case with the infinitely small because specific laws happen there, said to
be counter-intuitive. Yet there is a sign that should guide us. The space
between the nucleus and the electrons is, proportionally to their sizes, an
abyss of space (emptiness).
In reality, the universe is
fractal, i.e. there are scale
"jumps" within which particular (related) laws of
functioning govern each particular space-time.
It is the case with quarks, atoms, molecules, cells, organs, bodies, groups of
bodies and groups of groups which are in themselves as many space-times. We
live in the middle of a skilfully baked (wafered) cream slice. Far from me the
idea to evoke here the Great Confectioner. You are the only judge to appreciate
the end purpose of it. My purpose is to point out the common feature of these
scales, or these layers : the wave-like character of these demonstrations..
i.e. these vibrations, because
everything is vibration.
Matter has a corpuscular / wave
duality. It is exactly in the passage from one to another, of the particle to
the wave, that the increase of the density of time happens, with a loss of mass
(neutrinos, photons, electrons, tachyons), in the process. Here too, there has
been confusion since the time of
Einstein demonstrated, thanks
to Riemann's works ( non-Euclidian geometry), that gravity is geometrical in
nature. Actually, gravity is strictly related to space-times. Moreover, it goes
through them because it participates in their modification. Gravity increases
as does the density of time. It is also induced, in the electromagnetic forces.
The queen of vibrations is the electromagnetic wave whose spectrum has such an
astronomical number of frequencies that it makes your head swim.
Matter is seething with frequencies,
even in low temperatures. At zero Kelvin degree, states of matter change,
(function of state in quantum mechanics). Now, the rotor of a UFO
"orbits" in a vacuum at
absolute zero degree!
We are beginning to come out of the matrix. You really have to get out of the observer's position to understand that what seems to us to be on the same plane - an apple and a stone for example - are absolutely not so. We see them as such because we belong to a "superior" (higher) space-time. In fact, we are just on the border because, naturally, superior time densities of time are mixing with us for whom we are "physically" merged with the apple, or the worm which is inside. What happens when we observe by means of a microscope with a tunnel effect ? We observe "superior" space-times just as the astronomer sees "lower" space-times with his telescope. The difference which we attribute to both is the apparent proportion of objects.